Why "Understanding Science" is much more difficult than "Testing Science"?

(Own created picture based on scientific study and observation in experiment) An Illustration of "understanding Science" versus "Testing Science"

Why "Understanding Science" is much more difficult than "Testing Science"?

Prof. Hendry Izaac Elim, Ph.D

Elim Advanced Technology Laboratory (EAT Lab)

Center for Archipelago Physics (CAP)

Department of Physics

Pattimura university

This compact live video recording from Jakarta, Indonesia on Saturday morning before breakfast time in October 2026 is all about a mystery of scientific understanding which is much more difficult than testing science herself.

The reason for such fantastic search has been being investigated by various multi-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary scientists from the last few decades.

Sometimes, a problem-solving system in scientific habit is not enough to extract the core of the science.

Therefore, this explanation and argument of the statement of "Why "Understanding Science" is much more difficult than "Testing Science" ?" is provided shortly here. 

I will share my thought using a very simple logic of Trinity Intelligence (TI) Concept (based on references: for example in URL (research gate, Ref[1] , Ref[2], Ref[3], Ref[4], Ref[5] ,et cetera)).

(Generated-AI-picture) TI-Illustration's picture.

Basic universe can be described by 2 to 3 fundamental conservation laws parameters.

Generally, Gravity, Time and spacetime are 3 basic physical parameters with many complex debates among scientists over time and generations.

Isaac Newton who proposed gravity theory and calculus to explain it briefly. Moreover, Albert Einstein proposed general relativity theory and its calculation about spacetime bending as a results in gravity force production. In addition, Stephen Hawking tried to extract the understanding of time in higher dimensions of 5D or above. 

Since that times, many ongoing active researchers in physics field of studies as well as physical mathematicians such as Laureate Prof. Roger Penrose and Laureate Prof. Edward Witten introduced string theory to look deeper about a possibility of the smallest existence string-like particle as the elementary particle in higher dimension over 5 D and higher.

However, there is no evident of string like particle smaller than electron or quarks and so forth.  

In this popular article, we explain such mystery of understanding science via comparing it with the results of testing science.

The video briefly shows what are [i]. gravity, [ii]. time, and [iii]. spacetime  actually?

In conclusion, the answers have been promptly provided in the attached video.